From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75174 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric S Fraga Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Nicely faster startup Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:12:54 +0000 Message-ID: <87lj3p9xjt.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292538640 10092 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2010 22:30:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:30:40 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23529@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Dec 16 23:30:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTMLH-0000sE-5j for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:30:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTMKG-0006kd-E5; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:29:28 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTMKF-0006kP-6d for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:29:27 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTMKA-0006fF-83 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:29:26 -0600 Original-Received: from vscane-a2.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.42]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTM4I-0001ra-29 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:12:58 +0100 Original-Received: from 79-67-228-71.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([79.67.228.71] helo=localhost) by vscane-a.ucl.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTM4F-00066A-TD for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:12:56 +0000 X-Face: av6A"vZ{AypDB`d^.T35oG%$E*Qh]4F)K=*$-NHz5{7WZfAFQFB]F@gf}l9`XLs9(iD?D/! nafKE,S#G!4W/flj=9(U{]t'lP,,5~:s*~;kKR In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:30:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk@ucl.ac.uk for more information X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UCL-MailScanner-From: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75174 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > James Cloos writes: > >> As of my last pull startup times have shrunk nicely. > > Nice. > >> Down to ~15 minutes to get the replies to the uid fetch flag calls for >> each imap group, and <1 minute for gnus itself (down from ~12 or so). > > But 15 minutes!? Are you serious? How many groups is that? Sorry to jump in to the middle of this but my startup of gnus on my netbook is on the order of 5 minutes whereas it's well under a minute on my desktop. The processor and memory specs cannot account for this difference, in my view, but I would like to figure out where the time is being spent in each case as the configurations are slightly different. Can you please advise on how to do this? elp-instrument-package gnus- doesn't return anything useful for some reason. Thanks, eric -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 23.2.1 + No Gnus v0.11