From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73580 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Outstanding stuff? Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:14:06 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87lj5mw5y9.fsf@dod.no> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288026919 9886 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2010 17:15:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:15:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21949@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Oct 25 19:15:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQdb-0001dg-9H for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:15:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQdY-00079T-OS; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQdX-000798-1r for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:15:07 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQdW-0002Bz-85 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PAQdV-0005IJ-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:15:05 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQdT-0001a0-OG for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:15:03 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no ([84.208.204.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:15:03 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:15:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IIJezANoRpb5TvT2kbUnnbXHB5U= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73580 Archived-At: >>>>> Robert Pluim : >> HOWEVER, we could just cheat and totally special-case things for >> nnimap. That is, a new interface function >> >> (*-request-move-articles-internally articles from-group server to-group) >> >> If it exists, and the move is internal (from one group on the same IMAP >> server to another), this would just issue COPY + \Deleted + EXPUNGE, and >> forget about all Gnus niceties with the cache/agent/etc. > That would work for me. In this particular case speed is more > important to me than features :-) What will it mean wrt. to uniformity for copies and moves across backends? Will it still be possible to split from nnimap to eg. nnml folders?