From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69938 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: overriding marks for synchronization Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:44:17 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87lj84doi6.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87eie6fzr5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d3tpmft7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y6cbehau.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878w4afzez.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zkwqej4u.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878w4aegbp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zkwqfgj8.fsf@dod.no> <87wrru9tee.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871va11fhz.fsf@dod.no> <87wrrtdz0u.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878w48dsym.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282139083 4842 80.91.229.12 (18 Aug 2010 13:44:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:44:43 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18324@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Aug 18 15:44:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OliwU-0002SU-4I for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:44:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OliwR-0000C5-K7; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:44:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OliwQ-0000Br-E8 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:44:30 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OliwP-00072r-7x for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:44:30 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OliwO-0007EE-00 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:44:28 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OliwK-0002MT-BJ for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:44:24 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:44:24 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:44:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9WV15gORA6/0oTL6EVTvmCbnggs= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69938 Archived-At: On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:18:57 +0200 Steinar Bang wrote: SB> Ok, some user experiences, once I've been able to save to the sync file: SB> - Most of the time synchronization from other machines doesn't seem to SB> take place SB> - In one case yesterday, synchronization from my netbook to my desktop SB> machine actually happened on the desktop machine, but only on the SB> third consecutive start of M-x gnus on that machine SB> - On my netbook tramp complains on Gnus startup that the process buffer SB> has died, killing gnus in the startup, and the half-ready *Group* SB> buffer, and then starting gnus again, seems to fix the issue SB> - In two cases now, starting gnus on my netbook (which was the last one SB> to save to the gnussync file), some already read articles on this SB> group and on gmane.discuss were shown as unread SB> Do you need to see some of my gnus config (of which there is quite a SB> bit) to see what might be different from yours. No, it's OK. I have to work out a nicer merge algorithm instead of "just overwrite." In the process I'll put safeguards around the existing code to catch the cases you describe. Ted