From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67819
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: jidanni@jidanni.org
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: unmarking in *Dead Summary* forgotten
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:12:33 +0800
Message-ID: <87ljv8jy72.fsf@jidanni.org>
References: <874p1xdmrl.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227582841 24651 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2008 03:14:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:14:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16266@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 25 04:15:03 2008
Return-path: <ding-owner+M16266@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1L4oOE-0003nf-5j
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:15:02 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M16266@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1L4oLz-0002di-DK; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:12:43 -0600
Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <jidanni@jidanni.org>)
	id 1L4oLy-0002dY-BA
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:12:42 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jidanni@jidanni.org>)
	id 1L4oLv-00009i-EN
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:12:42 -0600
Original-Received: from sd-green-bigip-83.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.83] helo=homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com)
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1L4oM5-0006LU-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:12:49 +0100
Original-Received: from jidanni1.jidanni.org (122-127-34-245.dynamic.hinet.net [122.127.34.245])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60F1D26F8
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:12:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:67819
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67819>

RS> If it's supposed to be a "normal summary buffer", unmarking after
RS> waking up a dead summary buffer should work.

Many of the Dead Summary operations work as documented. Except the one
I reported in this thread.

That is extra bad because the user already has learned to trust the
Dead Summary operations, as the others work. Only later, if he is
lucky, does he discover that his unmarking was thrown away.