From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)
Subject: Re: CRM114 Mailfilter and spam.el
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 18:06:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lllegya2.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wu4ysxum.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de>
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 08:22:25 +0200, Kai wrote:
> asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
>> * If a spam is misclassified as ham, I would like to mark that
>> message in some way, so that it is moved to nnml:spam and
>> mailfilter.crm is called with --learnspam on it.
> I think you want to set spam-process-ham-in-spam-groups for this
> one.
>> * If a ham is misclassified as spam, and therefore is split into
>> nnml:spam, I would like to move it to the correct group and have
>> mailfilter.crm called on it with --learnnonspam.
> But I can't find spam-process-spam-in-ham-groups. Hm.
Okay, I got it almost working (by reading the documentation one more
time).
My understanding so far is this:
* I want all my groups to be unclassified - because I only want to
train on errors (marking them by hand). I never want to train on
properly classified ham nor spam.
* On the topic that contains all my normal email-groups, I've set
these parameters:
((spam-process
'(spam spam-use-crm114))
(spam-process-destination . "nnml:spam"))
This means that if spam ends up in one of my normal email-groups, I
mark it with M-d ($), and it crm114 is called to learn it as spam,
and it is moved to nnml:spam.
Success! This is what I want, and it works.
* On my nnml:spam-group (where spam is split to, and moved to as per
above) I've set these parameters:
((spam-process
'(ham spam-use-crm114))
(ham-process-destination . "nnml:normal")
(spam-process-destination . "nnml:spam")
(ham-marks
(gnus-ticked-mark))
What I want to achieve with this is: When a ham ends up in nnml:spam,
I tick it (!). When I leave the group, crm114 should learn it as
ham, and the article should be moved to nnml:normal[1].
This only works partially: The ticked articles are processed by
crm114 to be learned as ham (fine), but the articles are not moved
to nnml:normal - they stay in nnml:spam.
(I guess the spam-process-destination should be removed, as it
isn't used).
* My global variables are set like this:
(setq
; Only process each article once:
spam-log-to-registry t
; Only process spam in nonspam groups (i.e. Train On Error only):
spam-move-spam-nonspam-groups-only t
; All my groups are unclassified, I should remove this one:
spam-process-ham-in-spam-groups t
; Process ham in ham and unclassified groups:
spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups t
; I want ham to be unread when moved out (it never is, but that's
; what I would like if it did move):
spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group t
; CRM114 Mailfilter (I will submit a patch):
spam-use-crm114 t
spam-crm114-path "/home/asjo/crm114.pl" ; (for debugging)
spam-crm114-database-directory "--fileprefix=/home/asjo/.crm114/")
And I use (: spam-split) in my fancy split-rules.
This is very cool - it's beginning to make sense to me _and_ it almost
works :-)
I've only got the "ham-marked articles in nnml:spam should be moved as
well as processed"-problem left.
Best regards,
Adam
[1]: If the articles I mark as ham in nnml:spam could be 1) learned as
ham by crm114 and then 2) respooled, that would be even better
than 2) moved to nnml:normal.
--
"Mr. Cotton's... parrot. Same question." Adam Sjøgren
asjo@koldfront.dk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-02 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 20:54 Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-02 6:22 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-02 16:04 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 13:28 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-03 14:01 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-05 13:21 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-02 16:06 ` Adam Sjøgren [this message]
2004-04-02 17:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-03 21:10 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 21:19 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 21:48 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 21:58 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 13:29 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-03 13:49 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-06 8:12 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-06 21:40 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-02 16:10 ` Jody Klymak
2004-04-02 17:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-02 17:06 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-02 17:26 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-02 17:44 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-03 14:22 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 14:24 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-03 23:59 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-04 1:59 ` Jesper Harder
2004-04-04 13:07 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-04-05 13:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-04-05 15:50 ` Jesper Harder
2004-04-06 21:36 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-05-20 18:39 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-20 19:19 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-05-22 23:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2004-05-23 13:44 ` Adam Sjøgren
2004-05-26 16:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-26 20:30 ` Adam Sjøgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lllegya2.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk \
--to=asjo@koldfront.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).