From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54650 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam/ham exit processors Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:10:30 +0000 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87llqxqf1l.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> References: <76ekwpy35x.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <4nllqx47mx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87ptg9ryb2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <4nptg916wn.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067897463 17663 80.91.224.253 (3 Nov 2003 22:11:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3191@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 03 23:11:01 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGmub-0008WS-00 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:11:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AGmuP-0005Te-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:10:49 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AGmuL-0005TZ-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:10:45 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (quimby.gnus.org [80.91.224.244]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6C63A004F for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:10:44 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGmuK-0004SE-00 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:10:44 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 24 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213-203-244-156.kunde.vdserver.de Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1067897444 16444 213.203.244.156 (3 Nov 2003 22:10:44 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:10:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5MclIEbykdEr/QocxZKZklodkJU= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54650 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54650 Ted Zlatanov writes: > Sure, you could have spam moved from all groups to "nnml:spam" [1] and > then process spam only in "nnml:spam". I do that, and furthermore I > have the spam-process-destination parameter of "nnml:spam" set to > "nnml:train" so I can run SpamAssassin directly on the "nnml:spam" > group's file contents. In "nnml:spam" I have the > ham-process-destination set to "nnml:mail" and thus when I tick an > article in the spam group it gets popped and ham-processed back into > "nnml:mail". It's a pretty tidy system. Why do you have two groups, nnml:spam and nnml:train? Hm. Ah, maybe it is in order to avoid training SA on all spam. You look at nnml:spam first, then you catch all ham from there. Only *real* spam is moved to nnml:train. So you're not training SA with "fake spam". So it's a system similar to mine; I have nnimap:INBOX.spam instead of nnml:spam and nnimap:INBOX.makespam instead of nnml:train. And I only train Bogofilter on the borderline cases, so I don't move all spam from nnimap:INBOX.spam to nnimap:INBOX.makespam. But maybe it would be a good idea to do that. Kai