From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46072 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: TMDA (was: new spam functionality added) Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 23:30:44 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87lm7hvy0r.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> References: <87y9brejam.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <873ctztyth.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <20020801222925.A10502@mastaler.com> <02Aug5.143835edt.119445@gateway.intersystems.com> <02Aug5.174118edt.119294@gateway.intersystems.com> <874re5wvrc.fsf@home.lan> <87y9bhw2bw.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028842290 19840 127.0.0.1 (8 Aug 2002 21:31:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17cusS-00059m-00 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 23:31:28 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17cusB-0003wZ-00; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 16:31:11 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 08 Aug 2002 16:31:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA27830 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:31:20 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 22727 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2002 21:30:45 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 22722 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 21:30:45 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by gnus.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 21:30:45 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17cvDE-00014G-00 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 23:52:56 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 18 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: b48sfn.cm.chello.no Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1028843576 3869 213.46.211.96 (8 Aug 2002 21:52:56 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Aug 2002 21:52:56 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i386-debian-linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6ixd4D2hlH0Ly4ZNtNYSA3VzX8I= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46072 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46072 >>>>> prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc): > Steinar Bang wrote: >>> Steinar Bang wrote: >>>> That's bad. It should be the actual From: header used in the >>>> message. > ... >> Because that's the address I would like to validate, because it is the >> address my MUA uses when responding. > As long as your MUA uses the same set of addresses every time, and as > long as you read messages sent to all those addresses, there's no > reason to care which address someone else's TMDA knows about. Ah, we misunderstand each other. I was thinking about setting up TMDA for myself, and reply to From: is what I want from it.