Re: gpg-ring.el/gpg.el?

["Matt Armstrong" <matt+dated+1008538695.410e00@lickey.com>]

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> Josh Huber <huber@alum.wpi.edu> writes:
>
>> [1]  Signing/encrypting multipart messages should be done
>>      automatically, IMHO.  I'll try and figure this out -- the problem
>>      is that if you send someone an encrypted mail with an attachment,
>>      C-c C-m c p just does one part, encrypting the text before the
>>      attachment, leaving the attachment in the clear.
>
> C-c C-m c p encrypts the current MIME part.  If you C-c C-m c p on a
> multipart part, the entire multipart is encrypted.

I agree with Josh that it should be hard to encrypt anything but the
entire message.

If I do C-c RET c p, it puts some MML stuff way at the top of the
message.  Then I M-> and C-c C-a to attach a file, and some MML stuff
is stuck at the end.  I was quite surprised to find the attachment
sent in the clear.

-- 
matt

  Piki, you handsome cat, rest in peace  http://www.lickey.com/piki/