From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38286 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: self-contained nnml Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:20:19 -0500 Sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org Message-ID: <87lmk90z3w.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87wv3tqd1q.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174175 21563 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:22:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 1847 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2001 00:20:14 -0000 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com (HELO defaultvalue.org) (postfix@209.87.109.2) by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2001 00:20:14 -0000 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4760F57; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:20:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 273CEAC2; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:20:19 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Simon Josefsson In-Reply-To: <87wv3tqd1q.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "24 Aug 2001 18:00:01 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38286 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38286 Rob Browning writes: > So does this also apply for a group within a server? i.e. could I "B > m" a bunch of articles from nnml+rlb:ding-gnus to > nnml+rlb:ding-gnus-2000 and then tar up and remove the ding-gnus-2000 > directory without seriously confusing gnus? Similarly could I restore > the group by dropping it back into place in the filesystem? OK. After looking at what happens (now that I've upgraded to Oort), I can see that the .marks are per-group. It also mentions that it's per-group in GNUS-NEWS. Now I'll just have to see how happy Gnus is with removals and restores. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD