From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24452 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: pgnus commandeers emacs to check mail Date: 22 Jul 1999 12:07:01 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87lnc99ewq.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: <87d7xlpwvd.fsf@mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162016 8809 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:00:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA09342 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 06:07:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAB09733; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 05:07:33 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 22 Jul 1999 05:08:26 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA25357 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 05:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA09337 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 06:07:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.02 #1 (Debian)) id 117Fkl-0000S7-00 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 12:07:03 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Unfortunately because the interface to Gnus is inherently > synchronous I'm stuck using a kludge with recursive-edit's which > doesn't scale to multiple backends. Now all we need is a Schemer to chime in with "...but if Elisp supported continuations, recursive-edits would work just fine for multiple backends..." and thus win the second place in "I missed the whole point awards." (The first place goes to the multithreading dudes, of course.)