From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 24343 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2021 16:35:21 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Jul 2021 16:35:21 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1m2cQJ-001oFH-OR for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 11:35:19 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1m2cQJ-008GNs-3C for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 11:35:19 -0500 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1m2cQI-008GNn-9g for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 11:35:18 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1m2cQG-00HFFB-C9 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 11:35:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=k54dIjvoxrkxPyxLCAAifjCrw4tOYvjYlmpxFl1TrUM=; b=QicxszBH8GBHVKidMYWKwVRQbB B3A59Uqc3UxgFiqwW4WG2OaP41CCj9Ewpu8ZJWN49FJVK7Plb4tIHQrXTRobXRX8mQmIEmG4v2aqI S5wuRkNmjtJ+pIRKT4qfnduXSoUJoYJAq65qBbCfO7BazvwaIXgn6g9HTdncUV8rwO3s=; Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m2cQ4-0004tI-JD for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 18:35:07 +0200 Received: from localhost (c-71-197-184-122.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.197.184.122]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C08B9FEB2F; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 16:35:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1626021303; bh=k54dIjvoxrkxPyxLCAAifjCrw4tOYvjYlmpxFl1TrUM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DfaU4oerO7Ijy00I3UP9F9TDqk/U7diPDqHw9JdT6uBSHvRxmQelVNNIqdlE70U28 m+U8ySUEOGADUeM1rL67Q+/EFt+igxWbPprfNRy370r8qVqrVjp1uIX7BoxmBWwNXt MK7YuCURY0AQngzhRKrAuQorbilJjCE1mX2ajWkY= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Cc: ding@gnus.org Subject: Re: is it possible to search by list-id? References: <875yxllhkr.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <87a6mxlzen.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87sg0oj38s.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <87eec8it4j.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <8735sn3qw5.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <874kd11qnr.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87pmvo27bn.fsf@gnus.jao.io> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 09:35:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87pmvo27bn.fsf@gnus.jao.io> (Jose A. Ortega Ruiz's message of "Sun, 11 Jul 2021 16:34:04 +0100") Message-ID: <87mtqszu4q.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: Precedence: bulk "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > On Sat, Jul 10 2021, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > >>> by dovecot's fts) simply with: >>> >>> (add-to-list 'gnus-search-expandable-keys "list-id") >>> >>> that is makng the error parsing the query go away, and transforming to >>> the spec ((list-id . "foo")), which in turn dovecot's IMAP search engine >>> seems to like. >>> >>> not sure if this is intended behaviour, but, as they say, >>> se non =C3=A8 vero, =C3=A8 ben trovato! :) >> >> No, this was a misunderstanding about how `completion-all-completions' >> works, the queries are definitely meant to pass unknown keywords >> straight through to the underlying engine. I've patched this now, and >> added new tests to prevent regression. Thanks for pointing it out! > > Excellent! Thanks a lot. It's still nice to add extra keys one uses > often to gnus-search-expandable-keys, i think that i'm keeping that in > my config. Yes, you should definitely make personal use of this option for common keywords.