From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/85760 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus Own-Cloudy? Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:20:48 +0800 Message-ID: <87mw4mukxr.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87iofawbcb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87twyu6s7u.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423563715 31424 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2015 10:21:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:21:55 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M33999@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Feb 10 11:21:43 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7wr-0001Dj-7r for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:21:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7wR-0005lv-0i; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:21:15 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7wO-0005lb-1t for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:21:12 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7wN-0000AN-5w for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:21:11 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7wG-0002PH-1x for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:21:04 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7wF-0000sG-0r for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:21:03 +0100 Original-Received: from 123.123.18.223 ([123.123.18.223]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:21:03 +0100 Original-Received: from eric by 123.123.18.223 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:21:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 36 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.123.18.223 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:oyIenXA4o2vgiJr2ycjIGqAuMxc= X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.0 2014-02-07) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-95--6237h-0s--0d--git, 0.000-14--870h-0s--0d--repository, 0.000-11--691h-0s--0d--linux, 0.000-8--522h-0s--0d--desktop, 0.000-8--509h-0s--0d--Linux Spam tokens: 0.989-2092--138h-1024s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.988-2209--161h-1088s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.988-2209--161h-1088s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-external:quimby.gnus.org, 0.987-3--0h-1s--0d--unread, 0.986-2191--179h-1088s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 No description available. List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:85760 Archived-At: Eric S Fraga writes: > On Tuesday, 10 Feb 2015 at 14:05, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> I never paid any attention to progress of Cloudy Gnus, or whatever we're >> calling it, but then I got a desktop along with my laptop, and suddenly >> I'm VERY INTERESTED. >> >> Before Cloudy is a reality, have any of you had success simply using >> rsync between two machines? > > I use unison to keep 4 systems (two desktops, a laptop and a handheld > computer, all running some version of Linux) in sync. Unison is based > on rsync but is a symmetric synchronisation instead of > one-directional. I hope that makes sense... > > I am not sure why you see large unread counts. I do not. You do have > to be quite rigorous in the synchronisation and avoid using gnus on two > systems simultaneously, however. Thanks for the note! I'm quite sure I'm not using both systems at once -- every few days I spend the day out with the laptop, and it's a little rigmarole of updating my ~/org git repository, rsync'ing a few other directories, and then doing my best with Gnus. The first thing that happens is that when Gnus starts up all my nnimap servers appear offline (or at least whatever it means when I get an asterisk instead of unread counts next to all the group names). Refreshing Gnus after that gives me unread counts that might be reasonable if I *hadn't* sync'ed over the most recent marks, but for some groups it's in the thousands, which clearly isn't right. Is there anything you're sync'ing beyond the files/directories that I mentioned in my first post? Thanks! Eric