From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80080 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Christensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus registry upgrade didn't import old registry Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:43:36 -0400 Message-ID: <87mxdp1j53.fsf@uwo.ca> References: <87ehzkh4j2.fsf@uwo.ca> <87litbxd7x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zkhr11n1.fsf@uwo.ca> <87r533111i.fsf@uwo.ca> <87zkhruflt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwjizqbc.fsf@uwo.ca> <87sjnizp8y.fsf@uwo.ca> <8762kdu18w.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317177921 10604 80.91.229.12 (28 Sep 2011 02:45:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 02:45:21 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28374@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 28 04:45:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8k96-0008RQ-7E for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:45:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R8k7z-0005kT-SY; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R8k7y-0005kD-46 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R8k7w-0007mh-61 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R8k7u-0002X2-3l for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:44:02 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8k7t-00088g-G2 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:44:01 +0200 Original-Received: from cpe0023bee5dd21-cm0023bee5dd1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([99.249.62.111]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:44:01 +0200 Original-Received: from jdc by cpe0023bee5dd21-cm0023bee5dd1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:44:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe0023bee5dd21-cm0023bee5dd1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:6Rs1XbqjCF8GqltI/TSqOaIob34= X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80080 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Could you look at what the following produces? This should simulate > the candidates that `registry-prune' gets: > > (let* ((db gnus-registry-db) > (hs (oref db :max-hard)) > (ss (oref db :max-soft))) > (oset db :max-hard 10000) > (oset db :max-soft most-positive-fixnum) > (prog1 (list (registry-prune-soft-candidates db) > (registry-prune-hard-candidates db)) > (oset db :max-hard hs) > (oset db :max-soft ss))) The output is long and is shown with ...: ((536870911 (nil "<20110913120207.7B6336142@lwahl>" "fake+none+nndraft:drafts+1" "fake+none+nndraft:drafts+2" "<73b0a166382dc.4e6e5c38@uwo.ca>" "<1315880651.2311.22.camel@mike-desktop>" "<4E6F239E.8030506@gmail.com>" "<4E6EAF23.1070406@uwo.ca>" "" "<2139667233.835036.1315899248272.JavaMail.app@ela4-bed46.prod>" "<4E6F60C1.7090809@wagnerrp.com>" "" ...)) (8997.2 nil)) But there's a lot in that sub-list starting with nil: (length (cadar result)) 10028 Could it be that during the import-eld process, pruning doesn't take place? But why then was I still getting errors when new mail was arriving? (And could those be reduced to warnings, so that one can still receive mail when a problem occurs?) Dan