From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78792 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: message-cite-reply-position Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:54:43 +0800 Message-ID: <87mxitvcq4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305104129 16412 80.91.229.12 (11 May 2011 08:55:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:55:29 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M27093@lists.math.uh.edu Wed May 11 10:55:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QK5CP-0007fy-Aw for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:55:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QK5CE-0001Qx-CN; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QK5CD-0001Qq-F6 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QK5CC-0001mA-Gu for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QK5C9-0002qL-4I for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:55:01 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QK5C9-0007Xh-2p for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:55:01 +0200 Original-Received: from 123.121.222.100 ([123.121.222.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:55:01 +0200 Original-Received: from eric by 123.121.222.100 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:55:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.121.222.100 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6HBdk6k8zL2Lmj0htuRHO4X08DI= X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-1629--6010h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-1484--5473h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-1403--5174h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-1403--5173h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-1350--4979h-0s--0d--H*u:linux Spam tokens: 0.893-1948--3795h-46974s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.893-1948--3795h-46974s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.885-1617--3985h-45816s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.876-1302--4595h-48231s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.876-1302--4595h-48231s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO 1.3 TRACKER_ID BODY: Incorporates a tracking ID number -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78792 Archived-At: Sometime recently, setting message-cite-reply-position to 'above, to use top-posting in some replies, stopped working (point remains below the "so-and-so writes" line). In my gnus-posting-styles I've got the following clause: ("nnml.*" (eval (set (make-local-variable 'message-cite-reply-position) 'above))) Which I understand to be the correct way of doing things. (BTW, the docstring for message-cite-reply-position is incorrect, in the example it's mis-written as 'message-cite-reply-above.) I suppose commit ab3426faf8625b0b47c is the most likely culprit, where message-yank-original is rewritten with cond instead of case, but I really don't know. =eq= definitely does return what it's supposed to. Has anyone else seen that go wrong? Thanks, Eric