Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> I don't see (but perhaps I've missed it in the discussion) why not just
> implement -replace-article (maybe it can use -copy-article internally)?

That's what my proposal is, as suggested in the original (non-working)
patch against the old nnimap.el (included again below).

In short, when asked to replace an article, nnimap could instead move
the article from the group to the same group, but instead of using
the old buffer, use the edited buffer.

Dan