Re: (: spam-split) doesn't work

[Christopher Splinter <chris@splinter.inka.de>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, chris@splinter.inka.de wrote:
>> Note that the spamicity value differs from what `S t' returns --
>> which is a value of 1.0. Moreover, the *Article* buffer of the
>> respective article is deprived of its body after hitting `B r'
>> (which is what I did to get the backtrace) and the score of the
>> header alone (= 0.8477387640) is quite similar to the one below.
>> 
>> Debugger entered: ("Unsure, tests=bogofilter,
>>   spamicity=0.8469313635, version=0.10.3.1.cvs.20030227")
>
> (background for ding readers: Chris was having issues with bogofilter
> classification in spam.el)
>
> There's the problem, I think.   "Unsure" is not a recognized spam flag.

I'm not sure about that. After all, the above value is not what
bogofilter returns when the message, for which bogofilter returns
that value when called via `B t' or `B r', is piped to bogofilter
manually -- in that case, this is returned:

X-Bogosity: Spam, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=1.0000000000, version=0.10.3.1.cvs.20030227

Therefore I suspect that bogofilter isn't fed the complete message.