Re: message-utils.el: some remarks

[Josh Huber <huber@alum.wpi.edu>]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> * The filename could be shorter, to comply with whatever rule we
>   have for filenames.  Maybe mess-util.el or messutil.el?

Is there a rule for filenames?  Personally, I'd rather keep the longer
name than rename it to something which isn't as clear.

> * There should be default keybindings for all them functions, as
>   well as menu entries.  The commentary at the beginning of the file
>   has a menu structure; the keys cannot be used because C-c <letter>
>   is reserved for the user.

Yeah, that would be very nice.  Actually I hadn't even looked in that
file until now -- it has some handy functions!  Perhaps my
message-to-list-only would belong in there instead of in the
message.el propper.  (plug: C-c C-l in message mode is cool! ;)

> * Should message-strip-subject-was be added to message-setup-hook by
>   default, as suggested by the commentary?

I think it should be.  If anything, we should also have a default
keybinding for the subject change function.  that's pretty handy,
IMHO.

> Or should the contents of message-utils.el be moved to message.el,
> as suggested there?  I'm not sure about this.

I'd rather keep them separate, but that's just me.

-- 
Josh Huber