From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36289 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules... Date: 21 May 2001 10:34:01 -0400 Organization: Mind your own business, you silly arthur king! Message-ID: <87n1866aau.fsf@mclinux.com> References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> <871ypi7q10.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171899 7783 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 10245 invoked by alias); 21 May 2001 14:34:03 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 10240 invoked from network); 21 May 2001 14:34:03 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 21 May 2001 14:34:03 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA07613 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 May 2001 16:33:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lowell.missioncriticallinux.com Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 990369228 32483 208.51.139.16 (20 May 2001 14:33:48 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 May 2001 14:33:48 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 10 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36289 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36289 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > Or maybe it could bind the variable nnmail-incoming-buffer to the > right value, instead. But it should do at least one of the two. Ah, of course. If only for the sake of performance, we should just bind the variable and not bother copying the whole message. -- Josh Huber