From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4982
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: tom@smart.ruhr.de (Thomas Neumann)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Killing *mail* and *postnews* buffers
Date: 30 Jan 1996 19:20:28 +0100
Organization: Ruhr.DE
Message-ID: <87n375v91v.fsf@smart.ruhr.de>
References: <rjhgxdq5eq.fsf@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
	<vaf91ip6bhe.fsf@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m2ag35oapu.fsf@miranova.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145651 31435 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:27:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:27:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA09408 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 11:05:37 -0800
Original-Received: from smart.ruhr.de (smart.ruhr.de [193.100.176.36]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <TAA27626@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 19:20:42 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 1000); 30 Jan 1996 18:20:33 GMT
Original-To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 30 Jan 1996 09:26:21 -0800
Original-Lines: 16
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4982
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4982

In article  Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> Per> The drafts system is nice, but it has made it more difficult if
> Per> you decide not to post/mail anyway.  I used just to kill the
> Per> buffer with `C-x k RET'. [...]
> 
> Kai> I still do that.  Am I doing something terribly wrong?
> 
> By doing that you can end up with a lot of unfinished, partially saved,
> unuseful draft articles.

Maybe I missed it, but so what *is* the correct way to
do it now that the draft groups are in?

-t