Re: resending bounces: DKIM and Message-ID:

[Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca>]

Eric wrote:

>>> I have a solution! Potentially. When a user runs SDb, we first prompt
>>> "Edit original (bounced) message before sending?"
>>>
>>> If the user chooses "no", we resend immediately using `message-bounce',
>>> including the original Message-ID and all that jazz (though still
>>> respecting `message-ignore-bounced-headers'). If the user chooses "yes",
>>> we sneakily delegate to SDe, dumping them in a *Unsent Message* buffer.

I like that solution.

I don't like the status quo, since when you do `S D b', it drops you
in a message buffer, inviting you to edit it, but then makes the
assumption that you won't edit it (by preserving the Message-ID, etc).

My second choice is to just assume that it may be edited, and
remove the appropriate headers.

Dan