From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87955 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Newsgroup colours?!? Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:30:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87o9ipv0jp.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87fu9o1q5p.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87r2t8qvbw.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87woxd1scy.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87fu41ec50.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878t9t1or1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87a7u9wgmi.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523485746 14329 195.159.176.226 (11 Apr 2018 22:29:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eric Abrahamsen , ding@gnus.org To: Sam Steingold Original-X-From: ding-owner+m36169@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Apr 12 00:29:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.35]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6OEd-0003Yt-Uc for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:29:00 +0200 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 072b6484-3dd8-11e8-a660-b499baabecb2; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 22:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f6OG9-0007fX-Oy; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:30:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f6OG7-0007f2-Ay for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f6OG6-0001iT-08 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1f6OG4-0003v9-Mn for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:30:28 +0200 Original-Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6OG0-0002x1-Jj; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:30:26 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f6OFu-00034Y-Qe; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:30:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Sam Steingold's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:13:26 -0400") X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "hermes.netfonds.no", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sam Steingold writes: > I wanted the different levels to be visually different. > Level 6 is the baseline (you don't care about them) > and the rest are more and more important - > and that is _emphasized_ by the faces. > I honestly did not think the change could possibly be controversial. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87955 Archived-At: Sam Steingold writes: > I wanted the different levels to be visually different. > Level 6 is the baseline (you don't care about them) > and the rest are more and more important - > and that is _emphasized_ by the faces. > I honestly did not think the change could possibly be controversial. The normal groups shouldn't be emphasised, but be displayed in the normal, default, most readable colour the user has chosen, I think. That's why there weren't any colour specs on those, but various decorations for the lower-scored and higher-scored groups, if I recall correctly. So level 6 isn't the baseline, they're the ones you don't care about and should get a mellow colour. For instance, Turquoise6. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no