From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87393
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: SOLVED (was: ignore bcc when followup)
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:10:27 +0000
Message-ID: <87o9xu6nz0.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
References: <87y3wy8hd0.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487790708 29650 195.159.176.226 (22 Feb 2017 19:11:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:11:48 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+m35614@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 22 20:11:43 2017
Return-path: <ding-owner+m35614@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.34])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+m35614@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1cgcKB-0006o2-BP
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:11:39 +0100
X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0
Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208])
	by mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS
	id be22874c-f932-11e6-b719-b499baa2b07a;
	Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:11:42 +0000 (UTC)
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M35614@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1cgcJQ-0001HS-7H; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:10:52 -0600
Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32])
	by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <junkmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1cgcJN-0001Go-J1
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:10:49 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <junkmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1cgcJM-0001ss-E5
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:10:49 -0600
Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1cgcJL-00077K-17
	for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:10:47 +0100
Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1cgcJ2-0000wj-3n
	for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:10:28 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 32
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
Mail-Copies-To: never
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uOunEm4qsB71Xd3qm40w4I2owAs=
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87393
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87393>

>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:

   > Hi
   > as longer as I think about it: At least optionally the BCC field should
   > be ignored in the reply even when calling followup.

   > I look into the code, looks difficult to modify. Any ideas?

   > Regards

   > Uwe Brauer 


The following code does this

(add-hook 'gnus-message-setup-hook 'my-check-bcc)
(defun my-check-bcc ()
  "Try to avoid painful situations when using followup, and there is a Bcc field."
  (interactive)
  (cond ((and gnus-article-reply
              (message-with-reply-buffer
                (re-search-forward
                 "^Bcc:\\|BCC:\\|bcc:"
                 nil t)))
         (condition-case nil
             (progn
               (message-remove-header "cc")
               (message-goto-body)
               (message "There is a BCC field, we have deleted it!!!"))
           (error
            (progn
                (message "Followup??")))))))