From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86841 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus cleanup Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:43:13 +1100 Message-ID: <87oablff72.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87h9hied21.fsf@gnus.org> <87fuwyy302.fsf@gnus.org> <877fi9qsmh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8737sxcn92.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455335065 10055 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2016 03:44:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 03:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: ding-owner+M35064@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Feb 13 04:44:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUR7y-0005Gy-NU for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 04:44:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUR7d-0005TI-Lv; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:43:49 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUR7b-0005Sm-DG for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:43:47 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUR7W-0007PA-HH for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:43:47 -0600 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aUR7T-0008M0-N9 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 04:43:39 +0100 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aUR78-0001b8-1o; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 04:43:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8737sxcn92.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:17:29 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aUR78-0001b8-1o MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455939798.81386@Cm34QfBIA2YKfrE4jaeXbg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4636 Ham tokens: 0.000-56--2488h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-56--2469h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-55--2457h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-51--2253h-0s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.000-38--1684h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus Spam tokens: 0.995-5--0h-3s--1d--HTo:U*eric, 0.995-14290--393h-9882s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.993-12965--531h-9083s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org, 0.992-15407--701h-10841s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.992-15407--701h-10841s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-external:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: ham autolearn_force=no -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.224.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4636] List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86841 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Scratch that, the problem is that bum commit 9dc77e went into both > master and emacs-25, but the reversion only went into emacs-25. I've > switched to emacs-25, and everything's normal. I've now reverted it on master, too. Could you check whether it works for you now? > I know this debate is still ongoing, but is there any consensus here > about whether we should be using master or emacs-25? master should be getting all fixes that emacs-25 is getting, too, but (as in this case) there may be some lag. On the other hand, master gets all the new stuff. So it's up to you. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no