From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80804 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:57:35 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87obugtgts.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87mxb8jrei.fsf@nzebook.haselwarter.org> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325901621 27392 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2012 02:00:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 02:00:21 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29086@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Jan 07 03:00:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLZw-0006wQ-Tf for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:00:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLZs-00022b-Kb; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:00:12 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLZr-00022S-Mt for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:00:11 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLZn-0002ov-GP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:00:11 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLZm-0004m4-2A for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:00:06 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLZl-0006qC-Qs for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:00:05 +0100 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:00:05 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:00:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2X9pgtkDyDeXnnM48r5+avUIZOo= X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80804 Archived-At: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:01:22 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Philipp Haselwarter writes: >> Wouldn't it be practical if `message-position-on-field' would >> `push-mark' ? Then when you go change a header while editing a mail you >> could get back to where you were with a simple C-u C-SPC. LMI> `message-position-on-field' isn't a command, but a function used LMI> internally by other commands, so it would be inappropriate for it to LMI> push the mark. LMI> But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and LMI> friends) to push the mark... What do people think? I'd be OK with that.