From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66876 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: rfc2104 change on 2008-02-01 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:40:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87od7yrr1k.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> References: <87iqy6cj1f.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1209130881 16949 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2008 13:41:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, Kenichi Handa To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 25 15:41:57 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JpOBH-0006dq-1o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:41:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36327 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JpOAa-0006rB-Ty for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:40:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JpOAV-0006p2-2s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:40:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JpOAT-0006ni-WC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58582 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JpOAS-0006nA-Qa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from yxa-v.extundo.com ([83.241.177.39]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JpOAS-0006xw-B2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from yxa.extundo.com ([83.241.177.38] helo=mocca.josefsson.org) by yxa-v.extundo.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JpOAK-0005Ip-8p; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:40:40 +0200 OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt X-Hashcash: 1:22:080425:emacs-devel@gnu.org::ZTSHY7MFVfoqplLb:0qpg X-Hashcash: 1:22:080425:handa@m17n.org::qlLQm6VK524DHaU2:7Oyv X-Hashcash: 1:22:080425:ding@gnus.org::nJ4s7+VLTIQJF0Zk:Cahb In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:37:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95938 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66876 Archived-At: Reiner Steib writes: > On Fri, Apr 25 2008, Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> If there were mailing list discussions about this, I'd appreciate a >> pointer to that. > > This change was mentioned (but not really discussed) in the thread > "Emacs unicode merge changes to Gnus", ... > > ,----[ http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66251/focus=66259 ] > | > 2008-02-01 Kenichi Handa > | > > | > * rfc2104.el (rfc2104-hexstring-to-byte-list): Renamed from > | > rfc2104-hexstring-to-bitstring and changed to return a byte list. > | > (rfc2104-hash): Convert the result of concat to unibyte string. > | > | `rfc2104.el' is only used in mail/smtpmail.el and net/imap.el, AFAICS. > | Maybe Simon can comment on this. > `---- Thanks for the pointer! I just tried my proposed change with Emacs 23, and it didn't work. Neither did the old code. So I think someone who understands how to deal with binary data in emacs 23 needs to look at this... >> I don't think I was cc'ed, and I couldn't find any discussion now >> that I search for it. > > ... but I failed to cc you. Not your fault, I should have paid attention to the mailing list. /Simon