From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/60554 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: oddies with enigmail Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:29:03 +0000 Message-ID: <87oe96pnkg.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87slyqs9z9.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87r7e3ok3p.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121272437 32056 80.91.229.2 (13 Jul 2005 16:33:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M9082@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jul 13 18:33:49 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DskAS-0002zi-5P for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:33:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Dsk7E-0005oW-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:29:44 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Dsk77-0005oQ-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:29:37 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Dsk71-0006tr-UB for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:29:32 -0500 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dsk71-0000Lx-00 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:29:31 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 33 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: maportatil10.quim.ucm.es Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1121272170 1265 147.96.7.218 (13 Jul 2005 16:29:30 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:29:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:20:050713:gnus.ding::ir8IYn1EkHiLGTvh:0000000014lB User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vu9rRUSfqZ5SVOd+039G9HFh4iY= X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60554 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60554 >>>>> "Werner" == Werner Koch writes: Werner> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:16:10 +0000, Uwe Brauer said: >> gpg: NOTE: old default options file `/home/oub/.gnupg/options' >> ignored Werner> [ You should move all your options from that file to Werner> gpg.conf - Werner> options has been deprecated a long time ago] Thanks I did not know this. Werner> .... Werner> -----BEGIN .. Werner> base64/encoded/block Werner> and the actual signature in the base64 block indicates Werner> that another hash algorithm has been used (e.g. SHA-1). Werner> This may also happen if the Hash: header is missing Werner> completely because it defaults to MD5. Werner> It is for sure an Enigmail problem. I guess for some reasons it Werner> mangles or deletes the Hash: header. Werner> When signing and encrypting a different format than the Werner> above clear signed format is beeing used and thus the Werner> problem does not occur. The question is can I clear sign the message such that enigmail would not complain? Uwe