Re: Opposite of `T ^'?

[Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca>]

kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> I process-mark article A, then go to article B, then hit T ^.  The
> result is that B becomes child of A.
>
> I would like to do the opposite: process-mark article B, then go to A,
> then hit some magic keys.  The result should be the same: B should
> become child of A.

I've always thought that Kai's suggestion made more sense.  What
does `T ^' do if you process mark more than one article?  Make the
current article a child of all of them?  That's probably not usually
useful.  But with Kai's method, you can make several articles the
children of the current article, which is probably a bit more useful.

Don't know about implementing it.

Dan