From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37528
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: MML multipart tag -- what does it do?
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 18:06:07 +0200
Message-ID: <87ofpu330w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <vafwv4lt7nw.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<2nr8utf2u6.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
	<vafofpxrlu0.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<874rrolurg.fsf@smarttrust.com> <87zo9fq1az.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<ilu1ymriwv1.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172927 14363 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:02:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:02:07 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 25560 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 15:48:21 -0000
Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 15:48:21 -0000
Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de)
	via LF.net GmbH Internet Services
	via remoteip 212.9.163.52
	via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp
	for mail.gnus.org
	id m15TQ8a-001X1nC; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 17:48:20 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim)
	by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 15TQ7U-00071l-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 17:47:12 +0200
Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 15TQPn-0000gN-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 18:06:07 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <ilu1ymriwv1.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's
 message of "Sat, 04 Aug 2001 19:00:18 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7
Original-Lines: 14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37528
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37528

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> This requires users to know how the sign/encrypt mechanism they use
> are implemented in MIME.  E.g., if you want to sign using PGP/MIME you
> must write the above, if you want to encrypt with S/MIME you need to
> write something completely different because S/MIME encryption doesn't
> use RFC 1847.

Really?  I assumed it did, and using S/MIME in a RFC 1847 context is
indeed described in the S/MIME RFCs...

> Maybe users shouldn't need to know that.

Okay, I agree, so there's probably no other choice.