From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35962
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Doug Alcorn <doug@lathi.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=C6=D8=C5?= -- QP in subject
Date: 19 Apr 2001 21:30:21 -0400
Sender: dalcorn@lathi.net
Message-ID: <87ofts9x3m.fsf@home.lathi.net>
References: <3196664716389165@oakhurst.yi.org>
	<vafofttuq21.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<3196667051873244@oakhurst.yi.org>
	<vafu23ltabm.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <rj8zkx3yd4.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
	<87zodd5506.fsf@ait.uran.ru> <rju23lylry.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171628 6004 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:40:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:40:28 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 29967 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2001 01:24:28 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 29962 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2001 01:24:28 -0000
Original-Received: from cvg-65-27-175-98.cinci.rr.com (HELO home.lathi.net) (65.27.175.98)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Apr 2001 01:24:28 -0000
Original-Received: (from dalcorn@localhost)
	by home.lathi.net (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) id f3K1UNiW001076;
	Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:30:23 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: home.lathi.net: dalcorn set sender to doug@lathi.net using -f
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: +GT&`y}rSVHq>&PvSIvtsy^RC6Agyxq)t+25D#'iTroOnA/'pcE$QD*WU1=WLS*OC\0y-kS
 |k+)w~x<On+~nkw**|X{sAHBiS2:_=w#<!?;UWm4|C05osQ8`jpRF+[o!wRPjV`tiTN~i'XXwZz3w=
 7|j)RyEq{~2v;Ht<;!)b'Ni[A{&xm,Myo6+w+#e
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "19 Apr 2001 17:03:29 +0200"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
Original-Lines: 17
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35962
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35962

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> How difficult would it be to have font-lock in message mode
> distinguish between header and body?
> 

I've often thought that the "--text follows this line--" could be used
somehow in this endeavor.  If you just assumed header lines were above
it and body lines were below it it would solve a number of problems
(like wrong fontification of lines that begin with "foo:" in the
body).  It seems like the same kind of code that treats everything
below "^--" as a signature could be used for this.
-- 
(__) Doug Alcorn <doug@lathi.net> http://www.lathi.net chat:lathinet@yahoo|aol
oo / PGP 02B3 1E26 BCF2 9AAF 93F1  61D7 450C B264 3E63 D543
|_/  If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're
     free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait.