From: "Daniel Pittman" <daniel@danann.net>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't Gnus (er, W3) inline related images in <img src=cid:...>?
Date: 14 Aug 2000 13:31:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87og2w8qng.fsf@inanna.danann.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "13 Aug 2000 18:07:08 +0200"
On 13 Aug 2000, Kai Großjohann <Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE>
wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2000, ShengHuo ZHU wrote:
[...]
> Is there a standard of some kind that we can turn to to find out what
> is the right behavior? Should the behavior of the metamail program be
> considered a standard?
Last time I went hunting for information on this, that was the closest I
got. 'metamail' seems to be the /only/ reference to how it 'should'
work, and that's not actually documented.
Which is less than ideal, I think.
Daniel
--
> What should I look for in a good bird bath?
And in response, thus spake the Oracle:
} In a good bird bath? I'd expect to find birds.
} In a bad bird bath, tarantulas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-14 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-29 21:40 Karl Kleinpaste
2000-03-05 14:24 ` William M. Perry
2000-03-05 14:35 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2000-04-20 20:26 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-04-20 22:02 ` Michael Harnois
2000-04-20 22:53 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-04-21 22:37 ` Michael Harnois
2000-04-22 12:14 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-04-23 16:46 ` Michael Harnois
2000-08-10 18:48 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-08-10 18:53 ` Roland Mas
2000-08-10 19:00 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-08-10 19:02 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-08-11 2:04 ` Rene H. Larsen
2000-08-11 4:33 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-08-11 13:17 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-08-11 13:48 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-08-11 21:03 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-08-11 21:41 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-08-13 16:07 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-08-14 3:31 ` Daniel Pittman [this message]
2000-08-14 14:00 ` William M. Perry
2000-08-11 23:51 ` Rene H. Larsen
2000-08-12 1:04 ` Rene H. Larsen
2000-08-14 12:04 ` `mm-quote-arg' and shell quoting in mailcap (was: Shouldn't...) Toby Speight
2000-08-15 0:35 ` Rene H. Larsen
2000-08-15 12:51 ` `mm-quote-arg' and shell quoting in mailcap Toby Speight
2000-12-04 1:46 ` `mm-quote-arg' and shell quoting in mailcap (was: Shouldn't...) Greg Stark
2000-08-15 13:09 ` Shouldn't Gnus (er, W3) inline related images in <img src=cid:...>? François Pinard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87og2w8qng.fsf@inanna.danann.net \
--to=daniel@danann.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).