From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25780 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hannu Koivisto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: [0.97] `T #' oddness and `T ?' suggestion Date: 09 Oct 1999 21:37:43 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87oge8js7c.fsf@senstation.vvf.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163106 15843 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:18:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA26679 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 14:40:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAB03882; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 13:40:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 09 Oct 1999 13:40:27 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07458 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 13:40:17 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from senstation.vvf.fi (senstation.vvf.fi [195.74.10.211]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA26624 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 14:38:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from azure by senstation.vvf.fi with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11a1NH-0004tZ-00; Sat, 09 Oct 1999 21:37:43 +0300 Original-To: ding@gnus.org mail-copies-to: never Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25780 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25780 Greetings, Has anyone else experienced that `T #' marks articles as it should but then throws cursor to a more or less random location? Once it threw the cursor to the beginning of the buffer and once few articles forward from the article immediately after the thread I marked. A bit unrelated suggestion: what would you say about making `T ?' a default binding for marking current thread's articles (forward from the current one, just like `T #') as dormant? I'd also like to see something like `C-u T #' always mark _the whole thread_ instead of threads's articles forward from the current one. The same extends to `T ?', of course. -- Hannu