From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20990 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: More charset things Date: 04 Feb 1999 18:21:50 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87ognahyoh.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: <87d83qkyjf.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159182 20676 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:13:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13691 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:23:03 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB09270; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:22:21 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 04 Feb 1999 11:22:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA09667 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:22:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13665 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:22:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 108STO-0001Te-00; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 18:21:50 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Hrvoje Niksic writes: > > > Uh-oh. How can we possibly be compliant when there is no support for > > UTF-8? > > That's not my table. :-) When MULE supports utf-8, Gnus will > support utf-8. That is not a nice way of thinking. MULE is little else than a Japanese version of Emacs, and it appears that the Japanese are not interested in Unicode. So it wasn't implemented. I'm not sure about FSF, but for XEmacs, I know of no plans to implement it in the near future. > (By the way -- is it "MULE" or "Mule? The original thing was called MULE. The XEmacs developers prefer to call the XEmacs variant `Mule', or `XEmacs/Mule'. FSF Emacs maintainers seem to prefer Emacs/MULE. Unlike the XEmacs/Xemacs issue, noone seems to mind the different spellings. So I guess mULE would be just fine. :-)