From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19061 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2020 11:32:54 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.208) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Sep 2020 11:32:54 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kJxZu-00FG4C-WE; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 06:32:23 -0500 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kJxZq-00FG2F-9l for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 06:32:18 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kJxZn-005wJ2-Uw for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 06:32:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References :Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kx/LbH14x29eVYmiF3hwye74C/IFib187pCTUYUdb6A=; b=YMCH34hSiY/G4EGLsCiL/reF4u YqFYUlNsPLbI0i1PyTW0IHDo0uf1RMmfsxxs9lHSSkLXZLqnfRdlR9GNCXQ5nGbe6KJ0NIs103Euv 8Q6pHtLw5q7ChZCdJyOA+rk4q0rtOoUHd9nRZd1JreRv9NPPjwQl6RxpvPvpGDvHpgao=; Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214] helo=ciao.gmane.io) by quimby with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJxZZ-00070S-Iu for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 13:32:11 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJxZY-00025p-IB for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 13:32:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Kevin Shell Subject: Re: Gnus wrong message threading Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:31:51 +0800 Message-ID: <87pn6g1y6w.fsf@fedora.osfans.org> References: <875z8afr56.fsf@fedora.osfans.org> <87sgbef1rs.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87d02hlvjp.fsf@fedora.osfans.org> <87h7rtg8ql.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87o8m1gosz.fsf@fedora.osfans.org> <878sd4ojxy.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87wo0o20wi.fsf@fedora.osfans.org> <87363cogub.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rOWZFPUt+0S2sZoozvMlcna/Cv4= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Adam Sjøgren writes: > Kevin writes: > >>> Where would you have expected them to be linked, when all that connects >>> them is the Subject, as they have no In-Reply-To/References? > >> How about linked to root message with special marks characters > > They are linked to the root message. Isn't the [] vs <> showing that > they are special? > I view with trn-style threads with %B mentioned in my previous mail, no [] and <> characters. >> and add two commands/functions like link-threads break-thread and let >> the user joining the two threads together. > > Aren't those commands there already: > > · https://www.gnus.org/manual/gnus_39.html#Thread-Commands > > ? > Found gnus-summary-reparent-thread and gnus-summary-reparent-children equivalent to link-threads. :-) But still no break-thread equivalent commands. >>>> They are web mailers that don't generate In-Reply-To and References >>>> headers. > >>> Really? I'm quite sure that both Gmail and GMX generate In-Reply-To and >>> Reference headers when you reply to an email. >>> >>> If Gmail didn't there would have been an uproar. >>> >>> You are right that those two emails do not have In-Reply-To and >>> Reference headers, but emails from Gmail and GMX usually do. >> >> They are mails back in year *2012*. > > What is your point? > I mean they were old MUAs back in *2012* that don't generate the two headers. -- kevin