From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/88359 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Garreau\, Alexandre" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: undisclosed-recipients Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 19:23:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87pns0hld8.fsf@portable.galex-713.eu> References: <87sgwyv2gv.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="88057"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus (5.13), GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of 2017-09-15, modified by Debian To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M36568@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Feb 09 19:24:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsXIc-000Mjg-A6 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 19:24:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gsXHm-0000t5-7x; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 12:23:30 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gsXHg-0000qH-0r for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 12:23:24 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gsXHe-0007pG-8l for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 12:23:23 -0600 Original-Received: from portable.galex-713.eu ([89.234.186.82]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsXHZ-0002Ny-4f for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 19:23:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=portable.galex-713.eu) by portable.galex-713.eu with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsXHX-000152-G3 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 19:23:15 +0100 PGP-FINGERPRINT: E109 9988 4197 D7CB B0BC 5C23 8DEB 24BA 867D 3F7F Accept-Language: fr, en, eo, it In-Reply-To: <87sgwyv2gv.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2019 14:23:12 +0100") List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:88359 Archived-At: I=E2=80=99d say use Bcc, which possibly won=E2=80=99t be replicated among b= cc=E2=80=99ed=20 people, while putting =E2=80=9Cundisclosed-recipients=E2=80=9D in the To: f= ields.=20 It will be bogus but your mail client/server will typically notice=20 it itself. However putting =E2=80=9Cundisclosed recipients=E2=80=9D in =E2=80=9CTo:=E2= =80=9D when there=E2=80=99s no=20 mailing list address seems a common convention among spammers and=20 some mail-listing software and features from mail clients (already=20 received news from friends like this): do you know where do that=20 come from? maybe to paliate the fact the =E2=80=9CTo=E2=80=9D is mandatory= =20 according mail RFCs? Is there a RFC talking about =E2=80=9Cundisclosed=20 recipients=E2=80=9D? Because it is always that two words, sometimes with a dash,=20 sometimes without, sometimes with semi-colon, sometimes not, etc. Any idea?