From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86371 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Teemu Likonen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Signing messages (pgpmime) [solved] Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 13:36:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87poyumk3k.fsf@mithlond.arda> References: <87k2p3urb5.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <877fl3ch2j.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87y4djb2c7.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87two7qi8j.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <871tbbyta7.fsf_-_@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <878u5iod37.fsf@mithlond.arda> <87zixy8md6.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448913024 21790 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2015 19:50:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Adam_Sj=F8gren?= Original-X-From: ding-owner+M34603@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 30 20:50:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a3USg-0007Ej-Cm for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:50:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1a3URq-0007kv-Rl; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:49:18 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1a2do0-0000c6-11 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 05:36:40 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1a2dny-0007mE-Dk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 05:36:39 -0600 Original-Received: from mta-out1.inet.fi ([62.71.2.193] helo=johanna3.inet.fi) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a2dnv-0007hO-Lq for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 12:36:35 +0100 RazorGate-KAS: Status: not_detected RazorGate-KAS: Rate: 0 RazorGate-KAS: Envelope from: RazorGate-KAS: Version: 5.5.3 RazorGate-KAS: LuaCore: 80 2014-11-10_18-01-23 260f8afb9361da3c7edfd3a8e3a4ca908191ad29 RazorGate-KAS: Lua profiles 69136 [Nov 12 2014] RazorGate-KAS: Method: none Original-Received: from mithlond.arda (84.251.143.106) by johanna3.inet.fi (9.0.002.03-2-gbe5d057) id 564F1FE600C9DD6B; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 13:36:35 +0200 Original-Received: from dtw by mithlond.arda with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a2dnu-0002Bg-AO; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 13:36:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zixy8md6.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> ("Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren=22's?= message of "Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:11:17 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86371 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adam Sj=F8gren [2015-11-28 11:11:17+01] wrote: > Teemu writes: >> Could this be GnuPG agent issue? GnuPG 2 uses agent automatically, >> even depens on it, whereas GnuPG 1 needs "--use-agent" option or >> "use-agent" line in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf file. > > It might be, but I have never (consciously) used gpg-agent with GnuPG > 1. (Maybe Gnome started it behind my back, before I dropped Gnome, > though.) I think that more or less everyone should have "use-agent" line in their ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf file because then gpg-agent daemon is started automatically by /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90gpg-agent script, at least in Debian GNU/Linux systems. GnuPG 2 (gpg2) always uses the agent for key management but if gpg-agent daemon is not running it is launched temporarily. > I think I will use the opportunity to migrate to GnuPG 2 - the only > think I am missing is that building .deb packages with debuild doesn't > work, it gives up on signing the packages right away, instead of > trying to sign them. I'll have to do some searching to find out how to > fix that... I'd guess that that this is a gpg-agent issue too. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWWZHCAAoJEHGdadMkU5RQnGcQAJ0xt+Pr19i9y7btcCpoCFn1 dHjL5DVgWGzW2hBa33ZCYGpF8/KrEUlsfxcnDr2bx/A+6n2FU0nvLB5mBtpRdHkH oeCvANZey67UpWf7F/esDhGqAl7fstLYETfSX26ojf1SjytMK+ilw1umm3hNxUP7 yH7psPMVSwk8FXXpZApSKM+Z2xnrDeDIHwwUarbHfh7lUvWtVHYxILhvbiHE5Pbb drcZLRJ4iI/8x8BeriMXuqcIYJngCWfxJ1eZ2cLygkj8L+AiALrZ0Qf4vrxyHDxP 2/GIg4G3z1iz9MUYgfKBFeyeP7MPqji5cp0QGBd94nepr+rrMDHaS2dAEVLY1IW0 f1qNLVAewDZgRSgd5HtVZ2jG73EARc/2T+R+3eHROAarFpN6C62yE0umZ7UZFDVa 6dQcz/tpEpPk0dSlOtRmVwg0JqvAo6zP8I7DaJdzbJ/sa2kvXDNdbIifJEFonBPL Ln9f2ainfghuXIU3HxjajMUEI+NNPvtD5bWJBmJGfCrNJR/FstVB5L+aqinnhkEU 8YBXgXf5NTFOOY/iBIYDLICj03wIbfr1rFSeSNKLXwRM3u3bLZo9qAt4g1astNBb Z32NjPUNncPiiESvD3nzQm2EMrQoLDiyAUywl5SRKtFyw0HfvhrfHojwNPSUqHtb heRkAh06xP+Jkl4ddTcw =t9L5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--