From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/83976 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Builtin GnuTLS support and certificate verification Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:24:06 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87ppowom3t.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> References: <87iowbt5dq.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> <878ux782na.fsf@dex.adm.naquadah.org> <874n7uu2gg.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> <87txftsnub.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87li13q3dy.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87a9hjaj2d.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> <87r4anhrh3.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <871u2g1ofu.fsf@dex.adm.naquadah.org> <87vbz0vun4.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87y53v7n44.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> <87ob4rwcjx.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87sitvmhnj.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <20131216063116.Horde.4DpPSU3jbThs-I5XCvGUgQ1@ssl.eumx.net> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387207411 13597 80.91.229.3 (16 Dec 2013 15:23:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:23:31 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32228@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Dec 16 16:23:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsa18-0004F5-62 for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:23:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsa0g-0007ru-GC; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:23:06 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsa0d-0007rc-KE for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:23:03 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsa0b-00013U-6w for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:23:03 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsa0Z-0007TS-7p for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:22:59 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsa0Y-0003lb-Ui for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:22:58 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:22:58 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:22:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IxOXf/pnY92K+lpgGz7WiT2sHII= X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:83976 Archived-At: On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:31:16 +0000 "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: HJS> ma. 16. des. 2013 kl. 02.39 +0100 skrev Katsumi Yamaoka: >> Ted Zlatanov wrote: >>> I pushed this work to the Emacs trunk with the old behavior (connections >>> never abort, just warn). Please customize `gnutls-verify-error' to get >>> the new behavior, erroring out on validation failures. I encourage you >>> to try it and report any issues. >> >> One of my POP mail sources got to not work for today's Emacs build >> from the trunk. HJS> Here Wanderlust and Gnus only connect (imaps) when I revert r115532 HJS> (src/gnutls.c). HJS> Maybe a different issue... These are recent gnutls.c changes by Paul Eggert. Could you open a bug report and mention your platform in particular? I think they are not related to the certificate validation changes I mentioned. Ted