From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/83837 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vincent Bernat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Builtin GnuTLS support and certificate verification Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 22:09:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppqise8e.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> References: <87iowbt5dq.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> <878ux782na.fsf@dex.adm.naquadah.org> <874n7uu2gg.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383426602 27105 80.91.229.3 (2 Nov 2013 21:10:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 21:10:02 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32093@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Nov 02 22:10:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VciSK-0000nI-CQ for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 22:10:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1VciRW-00021H-1u; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:09:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1VciRT-000214-G5 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:09:11 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VciRR-00042K-SN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:09:11 -0500 Original-Received: from bart.luffy.cx ([78.47.78.131]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VciRP-0002oy-NZ for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 22:09:07 +0100 Original-Received: from bart.luffy.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bart.luffy.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB6B1446E for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 22:09:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=luffy.cx; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=postfix; bh=oRiYF0BHF BwimRI82PDwOMPzHiA=; b=iFwhxU2bl0Pm/ekLrmcRSawwA/1cqJT6u2dqJlO9m m2G5JPGjZv3aZxuALPNIlHeSHcBKZGfe8XQvEaCsYQlWmre+ycc0IKx7TIlz5RA1 caebFwdDu7MA2h4cZNKHr29QMcS+JYuc4AmA0BUzpV6GJUjzv6QJlA+8Ng6QOWdb vc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=luffy.cx; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=postfix; b=QV1 +NqZbU2KmhCfoDSYva2AjCNA7qslevPHijrf5pvA2vhHSQmayL4j0cLdODMsBHRq 97L8WW+GL95sHhbSF/CBirKFntcTQUFykfZgOt/7hql0DPBuUqMWaPvfyU2dOD2s nRjEcRRwZ5bm0CqLAD8ofQGM24hUnI18ogvwlVfs= Original-Received: from guybrush.luffy.cx (4vh54-1-88-121-64-64.fbx.proxad.net [88.121.64.64]) by bart.luffy.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEBFD14063 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 22:09:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by guybrush.luffy.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A145C33B; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 22:09:05 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <874n7uu2gg.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> (Vincent Bernat's message of "Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:40:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:83837 Archived-At: =E2=9D=A6 2 novembre 2013 18:40 CET, Vincent Bernat =C2= =A0: >>> Is there a way to enable certificate verification for Gnus? If not, is >>> there a way to force the old way to do TLS (by using an external >>> program)? >> >> This has been on my TODO list a year. There was a thread I launched on >> emacs-devel about that a year ago with Ted: >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-09/msg00154.html >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-12/msg00575.html >> >> I didn't have time to dig since then, but I'd appreciate any hint on >> this subject. :) > > OK, I have just tested myself with: [...] I have been pointed to this bug report too: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D13374 --=20 10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)