From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81551 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: What condition triggers to ham-process-destination ? Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:13:18 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87pqckzjip.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87aa3rfna0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331385218 9916 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2012 13:13:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Herbert Valerio Riedel Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29831@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Mar 10 14:13:32 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S6M72-0006fq-Bx for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:13:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S6M6v-0003mf-Ke; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:13:25 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S6M6u-0003mS-IT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:13:24 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S6M6t-0002GI-Is for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:13:24 -0600 Original-Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6M6r-0004eO-OS for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:13:21 +0100 Original-Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8801205F7; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:13:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <87aa3rfna0.fsf@gnu.org> (Herbert Valerio Riedel's message of "Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:35:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81551 Archived-At: On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:35:35 +0100 Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: HVR> But when unmarking false positives in Junk, I couldn't trigger the HVR> `ham-process-destination` action, i.e. the message is not marked with HVR> '$' anymore (, but stays in the Junk folder. On spam-group-exit the HVR> $-marked messages are marked expirable (as expected), but the non-$ HVR> marked messages are left untouched. HVR> What do I have to do, to have the non-$-marked messages moved to HVR> ham-process-destination? Which elisp function should I try to debug to HVR> find out what's happening? The messages in the Junk folder have to be marked as ham. This is controlled by the ham-marks group parameter, and you can check with (gnus-parameter-ham-marks "groupname"). You can set them as group/topic parameters; e.g. use `G p' on your top-level topic and set: (ham-marks (gnus-ticked-mark)) (if this is the only parameter, meaning you only see a nil, you need to wrap it in extra parentheses) Now, every time you tick a spam article, it will be moved out of the spam group for ham training when you exit. Ted