From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79409 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: lee Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "selecting deleted buffer" and buffers with sent messages staying Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:12:36 +0200 Organization: my virtual residence Message-ID: <87pqlm5dln.fsf@yun.yagibdah.de> References: <877h816fsa.fsf@yun.yagibdah.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310051580 27597 80.91.229.12 (7 Jul 2011 15:13:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:13:00 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M27705@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jul 07 17:12:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeqG7-0002JA-9v for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:12:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QeqFv-0000Pd-RS; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:12:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QeqFu-0000PI-Cn for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:12:42 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QeqFq-0004zn-A3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:12:42 -0500 Original-Received: from static.103.179.46.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.46.179.103] helo=static.73.179.46.78.clients.your-server.de) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QeqFo-0001Pj-Ko for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:12:36 +0200 Original-Received: from lee by yun.yagibdah.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QeqFo-0000qP-5a for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:12:36 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:31:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-1864--6101h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-1730--5664h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-1656--5420h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-1656--5420h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux, 0.000-1605--5254h-0s--0d--H*UA:gnu Spam tokens: 0.956-4309--1451h-53087s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.925-246--195h-4061s--0d--H*r:sk:static., 0.883-1583--4209h-53384s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.883-1583--4209h-53384s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.882-1380--3805h-47791s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: no -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79409 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > lee writes: > >> is it normal for buffers with sent messages to be left over after >> sending the message? Over time, more and more abandoned buffers >> accumulate. > > No, up to ten buffers accumulate. See `message-max-buffers'. Ah, thanks! I've reduced it to three now. Are there any advantages of keeping so many buffers? >> Sometimes I'm also getting a message "selecting deleted buffer" when >> sending a message, and the message I just sent continues to be >> displayed. It's as if the buffer I was composing the message in is >> supposed to be deleted but is not. > > (setq debug-on-error t) > > and post the backtrace. It hasn't happened again yet. I'll let you know when it does ...