From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71627 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Christensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: all nnimap flags lost again Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:48:42 -0400 Message-ID: <87pqw3nqnp.fsf@uwo.ca> References: <87y6atgthy.fsf@uwo.ca> <871v8lcl77.fsf@uwo.ca> <87iq1xi4sh.fsf@uwo.ca> <87mxr8nvzg.fsf@uwo.ca> <87d3s4nv88.fsf@uwo.ca> <87fwx0owzj.fsf@uwo.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285339753 8769 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2010 14:49:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:49:13 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20000@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Sep 24 16:49:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz9aH-0000Ay-Rq for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:49:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz9a9-0005MB-Nc; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:49:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz9a7-0005Lt-Lp for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz9a3-0005sW-4e for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Oz9a1-00020f-00 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:48:53 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz9Zz-0008Ub-8m for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:48:51 +0200 Original-Received: from bas3-london14-1096786111.dsl.bell.ca ([65.95.160.191]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:48:51 +0200 Original-Received: from jdc by bas3-london14-1096786111.dsl.bell.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:48:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bas3-london14-1096786111.dsl.bell.ca User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BiahudS3jMQFE916/WVBEa5pBMg= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71627 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Dan Christensen writes: > >> If you ignore the order of the data, the only difference is that there >> is no (active 67 . 3689) in the first output. > > That's really intriguing. What on earth could be removing the active > entries from the Gnus info? No idea. Can you recommend what functions I should step through during Gnus start-up to figure out what is happening? >> I'm running git from yesterday. If you think it would be helpful (and >> safe) to redo this test after upgrading to current git, let me know. > > I'm really mystified here. You have no special code or settings that > alter the infos in any way -- from a hook, or any other settings that > deal with marks or flags or something? Not that I can think of, but I do have a lot of cruft, so if I'm the only one experiencing this, it's probably something local to my set-up. I'll try to investigate it more closely over the next few days. Dan