From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70706 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Krause Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:14:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87pqwmsusz.fsf@news.realpath.org> References: <87hbi3jasy.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284052462 8997 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2010 17:14:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:14:22 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19079=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 09 19:14:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkhV-0000Fl-5U for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:14:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkhU-00067h-1b for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkhT-00067c-6G for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkhO-0005zH-Ke for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OtkhO-00050F-00 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:14:10 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkhK-0000Aj-Rc for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:14:06 +0200 Original-Received: from g226122004.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.226.122.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:14:06 +0200 Original-Received: from sebastian by g226122004.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:14:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: g226122004.adsl.alicedsl.de Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAACRQTFRF Gi45UTMqakk/O11tfFxSkHRrXoCRfJSipouFvqei0L230NDMOeopMwAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMB AJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9kBCA0KE3e43B8AAAIzSURBVDjLZZS/itwwEMYHDlLHJoG0FjpIeeDcXpHO kSFtggQqA4G7lAdXHEkdgZwHSDR+gkjbpLZfLjOSsvZevmbZ+c03oz8jwzyvT5VYEI/5z7Is67FE FwpHhFSTYprTSRERcnpC1oQ7ZZDQo7fOs6ZpAwv6YLS1ftMUCCwxeK2M8WfKwOtBKfsULCl8F0KN FfCPyyCh+9AKZSowJEcY1uh010oyOGs2eVh+m66hSjWgx38ghoEBrUqrKmJUCs3QUQuWKFKcZcFr 0bRSqUGIpkiwx4LjSoKyu6a5tN7orpE7IDhf6ne91rxGLqUH0Zb4iwFIb6iFHGlVBFhUSDYMoFVK ZyBqoVY8h5t7gIHyHYGPgyyGtrl4dvcH4Hosh6iEzIZGNJ96gIurazvRvc2g5FBA9/KeQf8leLrE GbSqoHn1kMHX4BFpfFTddNu9fuivLvobuk+c05EcKjdvu/c/+8Nt/zY6T/EVTHYwsL8+Hw79NzIk Bk6fAD72/R36iePkMCqfoBAW8fEWw0QdaKbAFUDnResPP8jAHQjQ7XMtAuNEQ0p7SHmcIXiTL092 lzYEz0stANlCHimMxcCdcyUCZKG9SDXQwPIWimGFmC1ajcoj1z+Wh7RCisHRHI007AFP+QT4cdAM 0oBOiLV+BTFfDD8WMiwb4OcxhfyKtvwCkNMT4ql+AfkFUpm471BBDZ9ZcimuUnQ8B+Xp52/FbrlL wi057R0pzmdtN7A7iD1IGfzn+AsV+h7ay6PlegAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:g95sMp+qU9+N9Wjg429wF7YDC+c= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70706 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Steinar Bang writes: >> One thing that has been a desired feature since nnimap's first days: >> partial download of messages. In particular: to be able to read the >> text parts of a message and delay the download of big attachments. > > If doing client-side mail splitting, I think one would want to skip > downloading attachments, at least... Now that we're talking about advanced IMAP features, is there any possibilty of supporting IMAP IDLE? Or is it totally against the concept of how Gnus works?