From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65632 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "duplicate" warning misleading Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:59:57 +0800 Message-ID: <87pryfxmiq.fsf@jidanni.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194897656 12386 80.91.229.12 (12 Nov 2007 20:00:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bugs@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14129@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 12 21:01:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IrfSf-0005Ad-SJ for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:00:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IrfSF-0003qy-Be; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:00:19 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IrfSD-0003qh-M4 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:00:17 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IrfS6-0006hh-3R for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:00:17 -0600 Original-Received: from lax-green-bigip-5.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.5] helo=looneymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IrfS1-0006dM-00; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:00:05 +0100 Original-Received: from jidanni1 (122-127-33-31.dynamic.hinet.net [122.127.33.31]) by looneymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8427928378; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:00:05 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.1.9 2007-02-13) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0342 Ham tokens: 0.000-2512--8320h-6s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-2315--7670h-6s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.001-12--37h-0s--0d--misleading, 0.003-6--17h-0s--0d--mime, 0.003-19564--65820h-349s--0d--HCc:D*org Spam tokens: 0.978-1--0h-2s--1d--UD:tw, 0.963-4014--1067h-46388s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.963-4014--1067h-46388s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.939-3160--1768h-44993s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.934-3009--1917h-44975s--0d--H*r:3.35 Autolearn status: no 1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0342] 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: pchome.com.tw] 0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase -1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65632 Archived-At: >> Gnus-Warning: This is a duplicate of message <123zzz@eee.fff> >> is misleading. Say instead >> Gnus-Warning: Same ID <123zzz@eee.fff>, as other message(s) R> Which mailer behaves like this? X-Mailer: PChome Online Webmail Of pchome.com.tw company. Which also by the way causes spamassassin to say 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.5 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different 2.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 1.7 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts 2.1 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily