From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65109 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: NotDashEscaped, what? Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:02:40 +0900 Message-ID: <87ps141bsv.fsf@broken.deisui.org> References: <87r6lpcn4l.fsf@cadilhac.name> <54a15d860708270349x29f0fb36g981f322a544db777@mail.gmail.com> <87fy25ci7q.fsf@cadilhac.name> <54a15d860708270617n7c9f5aa5w41f4404f6710dac8@mail.gmail.com> <878x7xcc7j.fsf@cadilhac.name> <54a15d860708270722n1652d373n68471e6eb11da91a@mail.gmail.com> <87ps19avog.fsf@cadilhac.name> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188540178 9395 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2007 06:02:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: michael@cadilhac.name (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M13620=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Aug 31 08:02:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IQzao-00054b-AL for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:02:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IQzam-0007qU-Gc for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:02:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IQzak-0007qN-If for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IQzai-0006sH-V4 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IQzah-0002eE-00 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:02:47 +0200 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so1262081wah for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:02:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=sJ1g8ho+c4R7Ksjcv6eR6mJmKTzwBSFMVwY8znOGpxeLkb15+zmbo9qOKZedS8TAKzRbJVtyn3OyPqDBmUmZSF0nUuk/pzI1PMmpNvy2NBSCtRLwBFYzyq1lVW/dyAqIJjZY6S4H6rQjvruMUsXb3fTppObvxNP+7vXAfsX/Y3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=niaNul/MispglfqWH/FinI98INqurpkCO+tqrM20Liob24NFwImPwyKGQ6RwDCTEmreKXKyHiw8AWk4usgytZgBKFX6U68Bu8idgSr49OUdSmF8+Rc5X8jZoGECiuuUfGbdv9rQwfvZgWoF1SMGVTICltfNZBgy10X+85SMRrlc= Original-Received: by 10.115.94.1 with SMTP id w1mr1158687wal.1188540165253; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from p360 ( [150.82.173.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k37sm1401861waf.2007.08.30.23.02.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:02:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ps19avog.fsf@cadilhac.name> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac"'s message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:39:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65109 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Hi, >>>>> In <87ps19avog.fsf@cadilhac.name>=20 >>>>> michael@cadilhac.name (Micha=EBl Cadilhac) wrote: > > No, but suppose the following case: the original text contains a line > > led by "- " (0x2D 0x20) as it is, and NotDashEscaped is specified by > > the sender. You will see the "- " prefix removed by Gnus. I believe it is fixed now. This is a test mail. If you see no NotDashEscaped and a "- " (0x2D 0x20) prefix on the next line, the test is successful ;-) - test Regards, --=20 Daiki Ueno -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG167Npbay1LFYE/4RAonhAJ9Dd+L4hS67coVaQ+NZPsLlVqsUsgCgicsb MfCKBT1+zMLINlBc5sC4eT4=3D =3DbtgH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----