From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62757 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: message-cite-function: message-cite-original-without-signature? Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:55:24 +0200 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <87psjla003.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> References: <871x2gp4ut.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87ek01bkli.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87acapbhh6.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144947445 22447 80.91.229.2 (13 Apr 2006 16:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m11284@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Apr 13 18:57:23 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FU57t-00064E-Ty for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:57:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FU57f-0001v1-00; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:56:48 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FU56P-0001uw-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:55:29 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FU56M-0003Yp-Vd for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:55:28 -0500 Original-Received: from yeast.orebokech.com ([82.67.41.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FU56L-0004lI-00 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:55:25 +0200 Original-Received: from pacem.orebokech.com (pacem.orebokech.com [192.168.1.3]) by yeast.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4CA12ED4 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by pacem.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADF63523EB; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: }9mYu,e_@+e!`Z-P5kVXa3\_b:hdJ"B)ww[&=b<2=awG:GOIM (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:14:00 +0200") X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62757 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Neat. That would be a solution, then. Unless it's annoying to have > `undo' do `widen'. I mean, it is possible that the user has narrowed > the buffer on her own to do a tricky piece of editing... I hadn't thought of that. But now that I think of it, we could make Gnus set `last-command' to something recognizable as the last step of preparing the Message buffer, and make `message-undo' do something special only if the last command was that command. That way, calling undo to get the signature back would work (by widening), and it wouldn't interfere with normal editing. But if the user does anything in the buffer before calling undo, even move around, then it doesn't work. Hmm. -- Romain Francoise | The sea! the sea! the open it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | sea! The blue, the fresh, the | ever free! --Bryan W. Procter