Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: 'g' not checking nnimap groups
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 18:37:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87psjxb8l4.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <smuek0dmlvn.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu> (gdt@work.lexort.com's message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:54:52 -0400")

gdt@work.lexort.com writes:

> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>
>> Actually, the bug is how (nnimap "foo") ever got into your setup.
>
> I agree that's a bug.  I think I did U and then subscribed to a group,
> before I realized the preferred way was to use server mode and browse.

I've tried that, and I can't seem to reproduce it.  But others have
said similar things.  Maybe it only happens sometimes.

>> The server (nnimap "foo") isn't the same as (nnimap "foo" (nnimap-port
>> ...) ...), and Gnus will treat them as different servers.
>> Consequently, (nnimap "foo") is treated as an ephemeral server, and
>> checked using the slow mechanism (I forgot the reason as to why, but
>> it is probably because it is simpler to optimize the primary/secondary
>> case).
>
> But, gnus used the same imap server connection.  The "foo" in the
> wrong group spec isn't the same as the IMAP server, so it must have
> used the nnimap select method in gnus-secondary-select-methods to find
> it.

Actually, I think Gnus doesn't, but nnimap then locate the same server
connection using the server name only.

But it was a long time since I looked at this in detail, so I could be
wrong, and the only way to find out is to play with edebug and see
what happens.

> On my list of things to look into if I find spare time:
>
>   add path from UNSEEN count from STATUS to count of new articles in
>   summmary
>
>   investigate nnimap/agent cache coherency, ensuring articles
>   deleted/moved by other clients are removed from the agent.

Fixing those would be very good, many people have problems related to
similar issues.  I don't think fixing them is that complicated.



      reply	other threads:[~2006-04-04 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-22  4:04 Problems with attachments in S/MIME encrypted messages from Outlook Dave Goldberg
2006-03-22  9:53 ` Simon Josefsson
2006-03-22 12:13   ` Dave Goldberg
2006-03-23 15:06 ` 'g' not checking nnimap groups gdt
2006-03-25 12:54   ` Simon Josefsson
2006-04-04  0:25     ` gdt
2006-04-04 12:36       ` Simon Josefsson
2006-04-04 13:46         ` gdt
2006-04-04 13:50           ` Simon Josefsson
2006-04-04 14:54             ` gdt
2006-04-04 16:37               ` Simon Josefsson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87psjxb8l4.fsf@latte.josefsson.org \
    --to=jas@extundo.com \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).