From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54641
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: spam/ham exit processors
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 20:29:05 +0000
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <87ptg9ryb2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de>
References: <76ekwpy35x.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <4nllqx47mx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067891371 744 80.91.224.253 (3 Nov 2003 20:29:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3182@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 03 21:29:29 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M3182@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AGlKK-0000Gv-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:29:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AGlKE-0004R1-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:29:22 -0600
Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221])
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AGlKA-0004Qw-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:29:18 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (quimby.gnus.org [80.91.224.244])
	by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119D43A008A
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon,  3 Nov 2003 14:29:18 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AGlK9-0003VY-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:29:17 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Original-Lines: 24
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213-203-244-156.kunde.vdserver.de
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1067891357 13461 213.203.244.156 (3 Nov 2003 20:29:17 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:29:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uDY4LIq1QClo0emlBllPdceFFEg=
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54641
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54641

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Mon, 03 Nov 2003, colman@ppllc.com wrote:
>
>>>>From my reading of the manual, it seems that the suggested or
>>>anticipated
>> modus operandi is to move spam in a ham-classified group to a
>> spam-classified group for furthur processing and to move ham from a
>> spam-classified group over to a ham-classified group for furthur
>> processing.  
>
> Nope, you can process the spam at the point of origin or in a central
> group.  Most people like a central "spam" group better.

Oh!  Does this mean that people could set
gnus-spam-process-destinations to nnml:spam, say, then set the
spam-process parameter just on nnml:spam, for it to be added to the
blacklist or whatever?  (Whereas spam-process remains unset/nil in all
other groups except nnml:spam?)

Fascinating.