From: Matt Armstrong <matt@lickey.com>
Subject: Re: Who sets Sender:?
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:04:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ptzppbjk.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3u1p1ibc4.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Tue, 21 May 2002 14:50:45 -0400")
prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:
> By "generated", do you mean automatically? I would disagree with
> that. Even if not, this is only a matter of SHOULD, not MUST, so I
> wouldn't say "required".
There is one case where it MUST be generated -- when the From: header
has multiple mailboxes.
I've never seen such a mail though. Perhaps it was a more common
practice "in the old days."
Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:
> As I said, this is a religious debate, one that will not be resolved
> here and now, possibly never.
I will say that it frustrates me that RFC 2822 isn't more obvious
about the intended interpretation.
The books like the Bible should elicit religious debate, not RFCs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-21 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-20 20:19 Norman Walsh
2002-05-20 21:24 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 13:43 ` Norman Walsh
2002-05-21 14:25 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 14:38 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-24 22:55 ` Steinar Bang
2002-05-26 13:48 ` Barry Fishman
2002-05-26 14:33 ` Harry Putnam
2002-05-26 17:17 ` Barry Fishman
2002-05-20 22:12 ` Matt Armstrong
2002-05-21 1:58 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 14:14 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-21 15:04 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 15:27 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-21 16:27 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 16:56 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-21 18:33 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 18:50 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-21 19:04 ` Matt Armstrong [this message]
[not found] ` <84g00lma45.fsf@rjk.greenend.org.uk>
2002-05-21 22:07 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-22 12:05 ` Richard Kettlewell
2002-05-21 19:46 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 20:13 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-21 21:16 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 21:51 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-22 0:02 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-22 15:23 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-22 15:54 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-22 16:03 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-22 17:04 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-22 17:25 ` Paul Jarc
2002-05-22 17:56 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-22 17:38 ` Bjørn Mork
2002-05-22 18:04 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-05-21 17:52 ` Matt Armstrong
2002-05-21 18:48 ` Stainless Steel Rat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ptzppbjk.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com \
--to=matt@lickey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).