From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37475 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Large *.pif base64 attachments and Gnus... Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 17:51:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87puabq0wh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172884 14117 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:01:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 19099 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2001 15:35:37 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2001 15:35:37 -0000 Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.87 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for mail.gnus.org id m15T3Sh-001X1nC; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 17:35:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15T3PV-0007Nb-00 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2001 17:32:17 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15T3hm-0000vz-00 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2001 17:51:10 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Pavel@Janik.cz's message of "03 Aug 2001 09:19:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 16 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37475 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37475 Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel Jan=EDk) writes: > of course I know this is SirCam. See the `;-)' at the end of sentence. The > thing I'm trying to solve on the list of Gnus developers is to fix the > apparent bug in Gnus which saves an article as plain base64 bytes without > decoding... Just try it yourself and tell me, if it works for you. It is a bug in 'base64-decode-region'. Perhaps it's fixed in Emacs 21, I don't know. The base64 encoding is indeed incorrect, and that's why such stuff slips through quite a few mail inspection tools; but 'base64-decode-region' does not signal the error, but simply does nothing. > I;d like to really SEE the contents of the file they sent me... Try mimencode, which comes with metamail. It is more tolerant.