From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35777 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Pittman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Quimby Upgrade Date: 13 Apr 2001 11:17:52 +1000 Organization: Not today, thank you, Mother. Message-ID: <87puehegxr.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> References: <20010410162812.7343.qmail@nightshade.la.mastaler.com> <87g0fg56fb.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> <20010411052354.D46053@kens.com> <87g0fepwkn.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171463 4836 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:37:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Keywords: though,daniel Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 1294 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2001 01:18:24 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1289 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2001 01:18:23 -0000 Original-Received: from melancholia.danann.net (203.36.211.210) by gnus.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2001 01:18:23 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (melancholia.danann.net [203.36.211.210]) by melancholia.danann.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFC42A879 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:17:58 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66241820EC; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:17:53 +1000 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?q?("Bj=F8rn?= Mork"'s message of "12 Apr 2001 22:22:29 +0200") X-Homepage: http://danann.net/ X-spies: Serbian Waco, Texas class struggle Mossad Ft. Knox Monica Lewinsky Kibo quiche Nazi jihad Kenneth Starr Ortega JFK Albania Honduras User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.2 (Urania) Original-Lines: 26 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35777 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35777 On 12 Apr 2001, Bj=F8rn Mork wrote: > Daniel Pittman writes: >> On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Robin S. Socha wrote: >>=20 >> > At least OpenBSD ships with BIND 4. >>=20 >> Which has it's bonus points... and it's own suckages. Admittedly, >> though, it's not /nearly/ as bad as Bind 8 (on 9, given the number of >> bug reports I have seen so far). Ahem. That should have been /or/ 9. :) > You should probably get an appointment with an eye specialist. Unless it's the typo which, admittedly, looks silly... Bind4 seems to have less day-to-day breakages than 8 or 9. It lacks *many* newer features, though, which some sites need. I don't quite follow what you meant, though. Daniel --=20 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessaril= y a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could= be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925