From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12007 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: stephen farrell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: slow checking for new mail Date: 08 Sep 1997 13:41:06 -0500 Message-ID: <87pvqjeji5.fsf@phaedrus.uchicago.edu> References: <87rab2bntu.fsf@phaedrus.uchicago.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.89) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151620 1325 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:07:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gnus list Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA28098 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 13:09:28 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA03098 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 14:46:27 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 20:41:16 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 13428 invoked by uid 504); 8 Sep 1997 18:41:14 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 13425 invoked from network); 8 Sep 1997 18:41:14 -0000 Original-Received: from euthyphro.uchicago.edu (128.135.21.31) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 8 Sep 1997 18:41:13 -0000 Original-Received: from phaedrus.uchicago.edu (phaedrus [128.135.21.10]) by euthyphro.uchicago.edu (8.8.6/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA09049; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 13:41:08 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from sfarrell@localhost) by phaedrus.uchicago.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA20856; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 13:41:06 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Colin Rafferty In-Reply-To: Colin Rafferty's message of "08 Sep 1997 11:05:36 -0400" Original-Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.64/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12007 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12007 Colin Rafferty writes: > My solution was to have a command that gets that just gets the new mail > once, and updates the *Group* lines of the groups that have new mail. Cool. This is the way it should work. thanks, -- Steve Farrell